<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard &#038; Trademark Deny A&#038;E&#8217;s Counterclaim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2006/08/27/richard-trademark-deny-aes-counterclaim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2006/08/27/richard-trademark-deny-aes-counterclaim/</link>
	<description>Trademark Properties v. A&#038;E Television Networks</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: al</title>
		<link>http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2006/08/27/richard-trademark-deny-aes-counterclaim/#comment-12318</link>
		<dc:creator>al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 02:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2006/08/27/richard-trademark-deny-aes-counterclaim/#comment-12318</guid>
		<description>yes you  are missing something...richard is a tight guy..(weird he likes the spot light)Doesn't seem like a dude that would screw someone over.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes you  are missing something&#8230;richard is a tight guy..(weird he likes the spot light)Doesn&#8217;t seem like a dude that would screw someone over&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn</title>
		<link>http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2006/08/27/richard-trademark-deny-aes-counterclaim/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2006/08/27/richard-trademark-deny-aes-counterclaim/#comment-214</guid>
		<description>I read through the claim and counterclaim, and I cannot believe my eyes: both parties seem to agree that there NEVER was a written, signed contract between Trademark and A&#38;E--just a verbal "agreement," informal communications, and a drafted but unsigned season 2 contract? I mean, cripey. My impression of the corporate world (and neither party is an amateur in that arena) is that one doesn't hire someone to change a lightbulb without a signed contract! I just can't believe they'd film 13 episodes and start work on episode 14 for season 2 without one.

Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read through the claim and counterclaim, and I cannot believe my eyes: both parties seem to agree that there NEVER was a written, signed contract between Trademark and A&amp;E&#8211;just a verbal &#8220;agreement,&#8221; informal communications, and a drafted but unsigned season 2 contract? I mean, cripey. My impression of the corporate world (and neither party is an amateur in that arena) is that one doesn&#8217;t hire someone to change a lightbulb without a signed contract! I just can&#8217;t believe they&#8217;d film 13 episodes and start work on episode 14 for season 2 without one.</p>
<p>Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
