Comments on: Trademark Properties v A&E Headed to Trial http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/ Trademark Properties v. A&E Television Networks Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:33:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Steve in Texas http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-12031 Steve in Texas Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:19:54 +0000 http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-12031 'Humble Webmaster', Keep up the good work! ‘Humble Webmaster’,

Keep up the good work!

]]> By: Steve in Texas http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-12029 Steve in Texas Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:08:15 +0000 http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-12029 In my opinion, Judge Houck clearly doesn't understand the Internet or this site. I followed the Scooter Libby trial, online, at firedoglake.com. And they get upwards of 2M hits a month. If anything, the Judge and the Post just helped drive traffic here on what otherwise is a fairly little known website In my opinion, Judge Houck clearly
doesn’t understand the Internet or this site. I followed the Scooter Libby trial, online, at firedoglake.com. And they get upwards of 2M hits a month. If anything, the Judge and the Post just helped drive traffic here on what otherwise is a
fairly little known website

]]> By: Steve in Texas http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-12025 Steve in Texas Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:53:52 +0000 http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-12025 Whoa, Nellie! ; ) Is the Internet weaving its web into America's court rooms? Not if a district court judge in Charleston has anything to do with it. During a hearing last Wednesday in a lawsuit between Trademark Properties and A&E Networks, District Court Judge C. Weston Houck commented on the potential role of a Web site that's following the case online. http://www.charleston.net/news/2007/jun/11/flip_this_house_case_spawns_web_worries/ Whoa, Nellie! ; )

Is the Internet weaving its web into America’s court rooms? Not if a district court judge in Charleston has anything to do with it.

During a hearing last Wednesday in a lawsuit between Trademark Properties and A&E Networks, District Court Judge C. Weston Houck commented on the potential role of a Web site that’s following the case online.

http://www.charleston.net/news/2007/jun/11/flip_this_house_case_spawns_web_worries/

]]> By: T.R.B. http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-12007 T.R.B. Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:09:13 +0000 http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-12007 CJ, I was going to ask the same question. Why the change in name?? Also, and I don't mean to be off color here, but is Richard divorced? He constantly speaks of his kids, but NEVER about a wife. Does he date Ginger? CJ,

I was going to ask the same question. Why the change in name??

Also, and I don’t mean to be off color here, but is Richard divorced? He constantly speaks of his kids, but NEVER about a wife. Does he date Ginger?

]]> By: CJ http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-11866 CJ Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:06:46 +0000 http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-11866 OK, I know this is off topic, but why did they change the name of the show from "The Real Deal" to "The Real Estate Pros"? OK, I know this is off topic, but why did they change the name of the show from “The Real Deal” to “The Real Estate Pros”?

]]> By: Steve in Texas http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-11730 Steve in Texas Sat, 09 Jun 2007 04:37:13 +0000 http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-11730 curt, 'Almost never' and '99%' are a little extreme ; ) The 'court' would prefer a settlement though, no doubt about it. curt,

‘Almost never’ and ‘99%’ are a little extreme ; )

The ‘court’ would prefer a settlement
though, no doubt about it.

]]> By: curt http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-11652 curt Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:47:18 +0000 http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-11652 Is it? Summary Judgment motions are almost never granted. This will settle like 99% of most cases. Unless one runaway party plans on spending in excess of the damages to make a point. Is it? Summary Judgment motions are almost never granted.

This will settle like 99% of most cases.

Unless one runaway party plans on spending in excess of the damages to make a point.

]]> By: Steve in Texas http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-11549 Steve in Texas Fri, 08 Jun 2007 03:13:55 +0000 http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-11549 From the article I see a possible 'tell' here to use Poker parlance... A&E with a statement, 'at the end of the day' (oh, the irony) and Richard Davis with 'no comment' Maybe I'm reading too much into that but I HOPE this goes before jury. DO IT! From the article I see a possible ‘tell’ here to use Poker parlance…

A&E with a statement, ‘at the end of the day’ (oh, the irony) and Richard Davis with ‘no comment’

Maybe I’m reading too much into that but I HOPE this goes before jury. DO IT!

]]> By: Steve in Texas http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-11543 Steve in Texas Fri, 08 Jun 2007 02:44:15 +0000 http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2007/06/07/teademar-v-ae-headed-to-trial/#comment-11543 This was a major blow to A&E getting their motion for summary judgment quashed. My guess is it doesn't go to trial and A&E settles with Trademark, to include a mutually binding permanent injunction and we'll never know what the amount was. I hope I'm wrong though! LOL This was a major blow to A&E getting their motion for summary judgment quashed.

My guess is it doesn’t go to trial and A&E settles with Trademark, to include a mutually binding permanent injunction and we’ll never know what the amount was.

I hope I’m wrong though! LOL

]]>