<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Lovely!  I&#8217;ll Take It!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2008/07/13/its-lovely-ill-take-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2008/07/13/its-lovely-ill-take-it/</link>
	<description>Trademark Properties v. A&#038;E Television Networks</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darin</title>
		<link>http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2008/07/13/its-lovely-ill-take-it/#comment-64070</link>
		<dc:creator>Darin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/?p=61#comment-64070</guid>
		<description>it is interesting some of the pictures people take to showcase a property.
  
Although,  I would disagree with the last one (the one titled ahhhh!),   i think that was a creative picture, and will either help or make no differnece.  No way it will hurt. I would consider mixxing in a simalar type of picture to one of my properties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is interesting some of the pictures people take to showcase a property.</p>
<p>Although,  I would disagree with the last one (the one titled ahhhh!),   i think that was a creative picture, and will either help or make no differnece.  No way it will hurt. I would consider mixxing in a simalar type of picture to one of my properties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/2008/07/13/its-lovely-ill-take-it/#comment-61962</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flipthislawsuit.com/?p=61#comment-61962</guid>
		<description>I have often wondered what home owners and agents are thinking with the pictures they put in the paper and on the MLS. I have seen adds for a house in color with a graphic stating that a photograph in not available. That always makes me think the house is so bad that the graphic is a better option than the photo. I have also looked at photos online before touring a house and wondering why they wouldn't clean the clutter up before taking pictures. Only to tour the house and find that it was the cleaned up version. Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often wondered what home owners and agents are thinking with the pictures they put in the paper and on the MLS. I have seen adds for a house in color with a graphic stating that a photograph in not available. That always makes me think the house is so bad that the graphic is a better option than the photo. I have also looked at photos online before touring a house and wondering why they wouldn&#8217;t clean the clutter up before taking pictures. Only to tour the house and find that it was the cleaned up version. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
